The copyright industry has traditionally monetized the exchange between creator and consumer through licenses and the subsequent payment of royalties for mechanicals (monies paid by a recording company for the right to use a song in a recording) and performances via MCPS/PRS and PPL. This royalty payment structure, however, has been severely undermined in the new digital economy, particularly with respect to mechanical royalties. The way in which content can be easily copied and distributed to users, via the Internet, causes difficulties for copyright owners and investors (i.e. publishers and recording companies), who seek to profit from the sale of units and collection of royalties.
At the heart of the copyright industry lies the need to maintain a balance between protecting intellectual property (rewarding creators for their endeavours so that they have an incentive to create), and the interests of the wider society (who benefit later from the free-flow of information to the public domain). Value is perceived from the point of view of economic investment, particularly in the UK. Hence, it is closely related to commercial utility. The law provides an opportunity for authors to profit from their work: it is the author’s right to copy. In recent times copyright law has been tested greatly; its wide application will continue to challenge the way copyright holders preserve the status quo, whilst responding to the increase in demand for access to new music services in the future.
Further reading: Davis (2005); Meisel and Sullivan (2002); Passman (2011).
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.